FluidStack vs Heroku Comparison

Detailed comparison of features, pricing, and capabilities

Last updated May 1, 2026

Overview

Compare key metrics and features at a glance

FluidStack logo

FluidStack

https://www.fluidstack.io

FluidStack is a cloud GPU infrastructure provider that aggregates underutilized GPU capacity from data centers worldwide to offer on-demand and reserved GPU compute at competitive prices. The platform enables AI companies, researchers, and developers to access large-scale GPU clusters for training and inference workloads, including support for high-performance interconnects like InfiniBand. FluidStack differentiates itself by sourcing capacity from a distributed network of partner data centers, providing cost-effective alternatives to hyperscale cloud providers for AI/ML workloads.

Starting PriceContact Sales
Founded2019
Employees11-50
CategoryAI Cloud Infrastructure
Heroku logo

Heroku

https://www.heroku.com

Heroku is a cloud platform as a service (PaaS) that enables companies to build, deliver, monitor and scale applications. The platform supports several programming languages and allows developers to deploy, manage, and scale modern apps without having to manage the underlying infrastructure. Heroku was acquired by Salesforce in 2010 and has since become one of the most popular PaaS solutions for web application deployment.

Starting PriceContact Sales
Founded2007
Employees501-1000
CategoryPlatform as a Service (PaaS)

Quick Comparison

DetailFluidStackHeroku
CategoryAI Cloud InfrastructurePlatform as a Service (PaaS)
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Plans Available10
Features Tracked1617
Founded20192007
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomSan Francisco, USA

Features

Detailed feature-by-feature comparison

Feature Comparison

Feature
FluidStack logo
FluidStack
Heroku logo
Heroku
api
CLI Access
core
Application Metrics
Autoscaling
Dedicated GPU Clusters
Dynos
Fully Managed Clusters
H100/H200/B200/GB200 Support
Heroku Dashboard
Heroku Key-Value Store
Heroku Pipelines
Heroku Postgres
InfiniBand Interconnects
Kubernetes Support
Low-Latency Inference
Managed Inference and Agents
Multi-language Support
Rapid Deployment
Slurm Support
Transparent Pricing
custom
Buildpacks
Custom Data Centers
integration
Add-ons Marketplace
Apache Kafka on Heroku
Distributed Data Access
Heroku AppLink
Add-on
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
security
Secure Access Controls
Security Patches
Single-Tenant Isolation
support
15-Minute Response SLA
99% Uptime SLA
Proactive Monitoring
Team Collaboration

Pricing

Compare pricing plans and value for money

FluidStack logo

FluidStack

Contact Sales

EnterpriseCustom

Best For

AI companies and researchers needing rapid, cost-effective, fully managed large-scale dedicated GPU clusters for training without hyperscaler lock-in.

Heroku logo

Heroku

Contact Sales

No pricing data available yet

Best For

Developers and startups needing quick Git-based deploys and managed scaling for modern web apps without infrastructure management.

Integrations

See which third-party services are supported

Supported Integrations

Coming Soon

Integration comparison data for FluidStack, Heroku is being collected and will be available soon.

Strengths & Limitations

Key strengths and limitations of each service

FluidStack logo

FluidStack

AI companies and researchers needing rapid, cost-effective, fully managed large-scale dedicated GPU clusters for training without hyperscaler lock-in.

Strengths
  • Rapid deployment of multi-thousand GPU clusters in as little as 48 hours with zero-setup management.
  • Single-tenant isolation at hardware, network, and storage levels eliminates noisy neighbors unlike hyperscalers.
  • Supports latest NVIDIA H100/H200/B200/GB200 GPUs with InfiniBand and 99% uptime SLA.
  • 24/7 engineering support via Slack with 15-minute response times and proactive monitoring.
Limitations
  • Enterprise-only pricing requires contacting sales, lacking transparent pay-as-you-go rates.
  • Small team of 11-50 employees and seed funding may limit scalability versus larger competitors.
  • Aggregated capacity from partner data centers could introduce variability in global availability.
Heroku logo

Heroku

Developers and startups needing quick Git-based deploys and managed scaling for modern web apps without infrastructure management.

Strengths
  • Git push deployment and dyno autoscaling enable instant scaling for web apps, unlike more complex setups on AWS or Azure.
  • Managed data services like Heroku Postgres and Redis handle backups and HA, freeing developers from infra tasks.
  • Native buildpacks for Node.js, Python, Java, and others simplify multi-language deploys versus custom configs elsewhere.
  • Doubled 1GB slug limit supports AI/ML frameworks, boosting complex app compatibility.
Limitations
  • Transitioning to sustaining engineering mode limits new features, lagging behind innovative PaaS like Upsun.
  • Runs atop AWS EC2 with dyno-based pricing that can escalate costs for high-traffic apps versus granular cloud options.
  • Enterprise feature freeze pushes users toward Salesforce alternatives like Agentforce.

Company Info

Company details and background

FluidStack logo

FluidStack

Founded
2019
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
11-50
Funding
Seed
LinkedIn Profile

Twitter: @FluidStack_io

GitHub: fluidstack
Heroku logo

Heroku

Founded
2007
Headquarters
San Francisco, USA
Employees
501-1000
Funding
Acquired
Parent CompanySalesforce

Comparison FAQ

Common questions about comparing FluidStack and Heroku

No FAQs available yet