Fly.io vs Heroku Comparison

Detailed comparison of features, pricing, and capabilities

Last updated April 4, 2026

Overview

Compare key metrics and features at a glance

Fly.io logo

Fly.io

https://fly.io

Fly.io is a platform that allows developers to deploy applications closer to their users by running them in micro-VMs on a global network of servers. It transforms Docker containers into micro-VMs that can run anywhere in the world, providing better performance through edge computing and simplified deployment processes. The platform specializes in running full-stack applications globally with minimal latency.

Starting PriceFree
Founded2017
Employees51-200
CategoryPlatform as a Service (PaaS)
Heroku logo

Heroku

https://www.heroku.com

Heroku is a cloud platform as a service (PaaS) that enables companies to build, deliver, monitor and scale applications. The platform supports several programming languages and allows developers to deploy, manage, and scale modern apps without having to manage the underlying infrastructure. Heroku was acquired by Salesforce in 2010 and has since become one of the most popular PaaS solutions for web application deployment.

Starting PriceContact Sales
Founded2007
Employees501-1000
CategoryPlatform as a Service (PaaS)

Quick Comparison

DetailFly.ioHeroku
CategoryPlatform as a Service (PaaS)Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Starting PriceFreeContact Sales
Plans Available50
Features Tracked1617
Founded20172007
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USASan Francisco, USA

Features

Detailed feature-by-feature comparison

Feature Comparison

Feature
Fly.io logo
Fly.io
Heroku logo
Heroku
api
CLI Access
Fly Machines API
core
Application Metrics
Auto-Scaling
Autoscaling
Docker Container Deployment
Dynos
Firecracker MicroVMs
Fly Launch
Global Anycast Networking
Heroku Dashboard
Heroku Key-Value Store
Heroku Pipelines
Heroku Postgres
Managed Inference and Agents
Managed Postgres
Managed Redis
Multi-Region Deployment
Multi-language Support
Multiple Language Support
Persistent Volumes
Private Network
custom
Buildpacks
integration
Add-ons Marketplace
Apache Kafka on Heroku
CI/CD Integration
Heroku AppLink
Add-on
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
security
Secrets Management
Security Patches
support
Prometheus Metrics
Team Collaboration
flyctl CLI

Pricing

Compare pricing plans and value for money

Fly.io logo

Fly.io

From $0/mo

Pay As You Go$0/mo
Standard Support$29/mo
Premium Support$199/mo
Enterprise Support$2500/mo
Fly Kubernetes (FKS)$75/mo

Price Components

  • Compute (shared-cpu-1x 256MB): $0.0028/hour
  • Persistent Volumes: $0.15/GB
  • Volume Snapshots: $0.08/GB (10 included)
  • Data Egress (NA/Europe): $0.02/GB
  • Dedicated IPv4: $2/address

Best For

Developers and startups building latency-sensitive, full-stack or stateful apps like global APIs and databases that need edge deployment without vendor lock-in.

Heroku logo

Heroku

Contact Sales

No pricing data available yet

Best For

Developers and startups needing quick Git-based deploys and managed scaling for modern web apps without infrastructure management.

Integrations

See which third-party services are supported

Supported Integrations

Coming Soon

Integration comparison data for Fly.io, Heroku is being collected and will be available soon.

Strengths & Limitations

Key strengths and limitations of each service

Fly.io logo

Fly.io

Developers and startups building latency-sensitive, full-stack or stateful apps like global APIs and databases that need edge deployment without vendor lock-in.

Strengths
  • Deploys Docker containers as micro-VMs across global edge locations with Anycast networking for sub-100ms latency, outperforming centralized PaaS like Heroku.
  • Supports stateful apps via Fly Volumes for persistent NVMe storage and managed Postgres with automated scaling, unlike ephemeral serverless competitors.
  • Generous free Hobby tier covers compute, storage, and Anycast IPs with pure pay-as-you-go pricing, avoiding minimum fees of Render or DigitalOcean.
  • 7th most popular deployment platform with 2.5% market share and 3M+ apps launched, backed by Series C funding and $11.2M 2024 revenue.
Limitations
  • Managed Postgres requires more hands-on management than fully managed DBaaS from AWS or DigitalOcean, lacking complete 'hands-off' automation.
  • Enterprise support starts at $2500/month, pricier than Render's $29/user organization plans for similar scale.
  • Smaller team of 51-200 employees may limit rapid feature development versus hyperscalers like AWS.
Heroku logo

Heroku

Developers and startups needing quick Git-based deploys and managed scaling for modern web apps without infrastructure management.

Strengths
  • Git push deployment and dyno autoscaling enable instant scaling for web apps, unlike more complex setups on AWS or Azure.
  • Managed data services like Heroku Postgres and Redis handle backups and HA, freeing developers from infra tasks.
  • Native buildpacks for Node.js, Python, Java, and others simplify multi-language deploys versus custom configs elsewhere.
  • Doubled 1GB slug limit supports AI/ML frameworks, boosting complex app compatibility.
Limitations
  • Transitioning to sustaining engineering mode limits new features, lagging behind innovative PaaS like Upsun.
  • Runs atop AWS EC2 with dyno-based pricing that can escalate costs for high-traffic apps versus granular cloud options.
  • Enterprise feature freeze pushes users toward Salesforce alternatives like Agentforce.

Company Info

Company details and background

Fly.io logo

Fly.io

Founded
2017
Headquarters
San Francisco, USA
Employees
51-200
Funding
Series A
Heroku logo

Heroku

Founded
2007
Headquarters
San Francisco, USA
Employees
501-1000
Funding
Acquired
Parent CompanySalesforce

Comparison FAQ

Common questions about comparing Fly.io and Heroku

No FAQs available yet